is boruto canon

I was raised on tales of knights and magic,'Arcane' gave me that old kind of chill so universally nostalgic it practically sent shivers down my spine. The plot is pretty sheer quality, while bleeding top of the line game lore right out it's gills. However, the characters? They're living, flawed and the most real you can find anywhere. This is no project to transform games into a series. It is completely artistic, well-speaking It speaks in a voice even higher than its own artist. And don't let me get started on all the pretty pictures. Utter joy! I reckon that Animation has just defined a new age, friend. I don't care who else does it: I say that it is canon in every sense of the word.

For those avid followers of 'One Piece', the question about canonicity of the movies is indeed a crucial one. As a fan myself, I've delved rather deeply into this topic too. So I'll share what I know about it. First thing you need to understand is what we consider 'canon'. Basically, this refers to the elements and pieces of the story that are officially accepted as part of the true 'One Piece' narrative, usually what has been directly written by Eiichiro Oda in the manga. When we look at the 'One Piece' movies, though they are incredibly entertaining and add interesting travels to the Straw Hat Crew's journey, they are not typically considered canon. This is because they do not follow the main storyline as written by Manga’s mastermind, Eiichiro Oda himself. Truth be told, many of the movies are side stories that only build on the existing 'One Piece' universe. However, exceptions exist. The movie 'One Piece: Strong World' can indeed claim some level of canonicity. This is because Oda himself oversaw the development of this particular movie and it fits well within the timeline of the main story. Besides, the characters introduced here, like Golden Lion Shiki, are canon. Although the actual events in 'Strong World' are not mentioned in manga, the setup leading up to the movie (tale & villains) was included in a special chapter. Similarly, 'One Piece: Film Z' and 'One Piece: Stampede' are closely tied to the original story and even feature classic characters and elements of 'One Piece'. Yet, it's best to consider them semi-canon, as they haven't been explicitly given that status by Oda. So, to give a conclusive thought on the matter, while most of the 'One Piece' movies aren't canon, there are exceptions. Some play around the edge of being canon due to heavy involvement of Oda or due to their deep correlation with the main plot. However, regardless of their canonical status, they're definitely worth a watch for their riveting adventures and explorations of the 'One Piece' universe.

Yes, Uub is canon. He's introduced as a character in the original 'Dragon Ball Z' manga by Akira Toriyama. Uub is actually the reincarnation of Kid Buu, the evil Majin Buu. Goku makes a wish for Kid Buu to be reincarnated as a good person and that's where Uub comes from. You'll get to see him first in the last chapters of the 'Dragon Ball Z' series where he faces Goku in the World Martial Arts Tournament.

No, 'Boruto' is not bad at all. He's really just the opposite!  the character Boruto is the son of Naruto and Hinata. Though at first as he is a somewhat indulged and rebellious child on account of feeling that Dad's behavior irritates his complicated Psychology of Father Complex, however boruto grows to understand the significance of being a ninja.

So: From what I see, this is something complicated! Uta, a character in 'Tokyo Ghoul', has split opinions among fans. The term 'canon' refers as a rule to things that are true or lore set in the original works. Though the series does cover Uta's past, what makes him tick and his relationships in full detail, we are quite a long way away from having everything pinned down. After all then, is Uta part of the canon? You bet. But do we really know him in full? Not exactly.

However, it is generally thought that 'Dragon Ball GT' is not canon.For the most part, that is because Akira Toriyama was not involved as deeply with 'GT' as he was the original 'Dragon Ball' and 'Dragon Ball Z'. Still, there are cool elements and bad guys in 'GT plus super saiyan type opponents for so many fans to love! So while it isn't canon--it keeps up some distinct fun in the Dragon Ball world.

As a big Naruto fan, I can tell you that Naruto Uzumaki is not dead in Boruto. In Boruto, This isn't the wild, devil-may-care, perpetually squirt of a lad he used to be. He's now a grown man who has eight children and is all business When it comes to politics or changing rules in any sport with disrespectful snubbing, DInserions like these gu te means most other adults walk on tiptoes around you. “Most” children of course don't have NINO parents, so it's no surprise he feels more shitty that way now than he did before we returned home Together. Although he appears less often and rather than aging, the focus is on a generation growing older and not yet experienced in failure. Naruto is still very much alive as well as crucial to this new series of books Whatever might be said about the nightmarish runs they've already put out by now: at least that Naruto is still Trying Harvey Mueller. Although his life is always hanging by a hair, Naruto--to the relief of all us who grew up with him as our idol--somehow pulls through.

Let's be fair, the canon status of 'Dragon Ball GT' is not all that clear. The original creator of the Dragon Ball series, Akira Toriyama, didn't do much work on 'Dragon Ball GT'. Generally speaking, fans turn their noses up at it because it is noncannon - in part since it cannot be reconciled with shenlong and the general story as told in the original manga so far. On the other hand, there are some fans, as well as Toei Animation (the company behind the anime) and contrary that claim it is again usable as another continuity altogether although. To put it however you want, which side are you on?