who is stronger than superman

Well, that's a debate among fans for ages! Both Omni-Man from the invincible series and Superman from DC Comics are super powerful characters with their distinct strengths and weaknesses. Let's first talk about Omni-Man, also known as Nolan Grayson. Omni-Man hails from a planet of Viltrum where everyone is almost god-like. I mean, he can fly, he's got superhuman strength, speed, stamina, and not to forget, his healing powers. And the cherry on top? His aging is slower than humans which pretty much makes him almost invincible. Now, Superman, the name's already enough, isn't it? Kal-El, the son of Krypton, is someone merely mortals like us have admired since forever. His strengths are quite similar to Omni-Man. He can fly, he's super strong, and fast, he's got his heat vision and freeze breath. Plus, he absorbs sunlight to power himself up. Admittedly, it’s hard to compare who’s stronger since it comes down to the plot of the stories they belong to. An all-out fistfight without any external favor would indeed be epic. There are instances where Superman held back as he cares for the humans and their world. So, if Superman is not holding back, it's going to be a tough challenge for Omni-Man. That said, each has their own Achilles' heel. The sun's yellow radiation powers up Superman, but kryptonite is his downfall. Omni-Man, on the other hand, doesn't have any specific weaknesses that we know of apart from the fact he can be weakened by receiving enough physical damage from beings of equal or greater power. In conclusion, can Omni-Man beat Superman? Honestly speaking, while Omni-Man has more experience due to a longer lifespan, it is still hard to say as Superman also has equally impressive powers and a noble heart. The actual outcome could vary based on countless variables. So, it's quite difficult to definitively say who would come out on top in a fight. But that's precisely what makes the discussions and debates about them amongst fans so interesting, right?

Though Superman is an iconic figure and loved by comic adherents like the one typing this, I must point out in all fairness that no one claims him as part of Marvel Territory me. Superman’s origin though is quite different-he is a classic character from DC Comics, first created (by Jerry Siegel and Joe Shuster) and repeatedly revisited. His debut appearance was way back in 1938 Action Comics # 1, which predates Marvel’s birth as a corporation by quite some time indeed.

The showdown looms, barely delayed, due to the importance of this matter. Kang the Conqueror is a time-traveling genius; Thanos, the Mad Titan an Eternal with powers approaching those of gods. Whom you choose to underestimate--well, that's your business. For Khan's manipulation of time and his advanced technology from the future might just afford him some sort of advantage. Nevertheless, if Thanos had in his possession the fully assembled Infinity Gauntlet, he would assuredly be more dangerous. Whichever way you look at it, this would be a battle for all time!

Coming from an old-school anime fan, I've got to say, pitching Mahoraga against Sukuna isn't a fair comparison! Both from 'Jujutsu Kaisen', these characters hold their own unique powers. Mahoraga, the disaster-bringing shikigami, indeed possesses unparalleled destructive capacity. However, Sukuna, as the King of Curses, takes the cake with his domain expansion, Dismantle and Cleave abilities. Personally, Sukuna's strategic and cunning mind swings the scales in his favor. A battle between them? I'm putting my bet on Sukuna!

As he has been in more fights, Garp Has more experience than Akainu. However he was turned down this title 'Admiral' several times. Afterall Garp is famous for his strength and that physical prowess might put one over on Akainu. But Akainu this Fleet Admiral has a Logia bucket! Magma-Magma type devil fruit. As both of them are so incredibly strong, it's hard to say who is stronger definitively. People are still waiting to see them both at their peak.

I'd say Gon has the potential to be stronger than Killua in a raw physical sense, especially if we're talking about his transformation in the Chimera Ant arc. But, Killua is far more skilled in using his abilities and strategizing. He's been trained as an assassin from a young age, after all. So, in a straight-up fight, I reckon Killua would have the upper hand. But don't take my word for it. They've got their own strengths and areas of expertise! For folks who love nuanced power comparisons, this is what makes 'Hunter X Hunter' such a fascinating watch.

From my perspective, while both Sabo and Ace are strong characters within the 'One Piece' universe, I'd side with Sabo being stronger. After acquiring Ace's Mera Mera no Mi powers after his unfortunate death, Sabo's strength skyrocketed. Not to mention, he's the second-in-command in the Revolutionary Army, implying his significant strength and tactical abilities. His haki and dragon claw techniques only add to this. But they both have their unique strengths, it's just about different layers of power.

Absolutely! In 'One Piece', Usopp's growth is quite evident throughout the series. Initially, he wasn't the strongest, often being labeled as the 'comic relief'. However, he starts to shape up during the 'Enies Lobby' arc, where he fights as Sogeking. After a tough battle with Lucci's subordinates, he shows remarkable courage and determination. The real change, though, comes after the timeskip when he gets a significant power upgrade and becomes more reliable in fights.