Is Deep Rock Galactic Split Screen

Stacking Nikki Sixx's fortune against other rock stars is kind of a fascinating reminder that fame and money don't always travel together in a straight line. I usually see his net worth estimated in the ballpark of roughly $80–100 million, which is a very healthy number — especially for someone coming out of the hard-partying, ups-and-downs glam-metal scene. That cash comes from a mix of long-running songwriting royalties (he's co-writer on a huge chunk of 'Mötley Crüe' hits), decades of touring, publishing and licensing deals, a couple of bestselling memoirs and the money that flowed from adapting 'The Dirt' into a film. He also diversified: radio projects, photography and various side ventures helped stabilize income after some rough patches in the '90s and early 2000s. If you stack him next to the absolute top-tier of music billionaires and near-billionaires, Nikki lands lower — massively famous acts like Paul McCartney or members of the classic rock elite are in a different financial universe because of songwriting catalogs, decades of publishing and massive catalog sales. But compare Nikki to many of his peers in the hard rock and metal world, and he’s comfortably near the top. He’s generally better off than many glam/metal contemporaries who didn’t hit the same songwriting or licensing sweet spots, and he’s often in similar territory to other long-career rockers who kept touring and kept their names active. For contrast, guys who stayed on the road continually or who sold their catalogs at the right time can eclipse or trail him depending on timing and business choices. What I like about his story is that his net worth is as much a story of resilience as it is of hits. Money can spike and fall with big reunion tours, catalog deals, or a popular movie like 'The Dirt'. Taxes, bad contracts and wild spending can eat into peaks, but continuous royalty streams and a recognizable brand keep a baseline wealth that many artists never reach. For fans, the number is interesting, but the legacy of the music — the way a riff or lyric sticks with people — is what feels biggest to me, even if the dollars tell an impressive backup tale.

Costume choices in kids' shows are sneaky genius, and Sportacus' mustache-and-goggles combo is a perfect example. The mustache gives him that old-school daredevil, circus-performer charm — a tiny, dependable visual anchor on a face that’s constantly moving and smiling. For a televised superhero who flips, runs, and bounces around sets, the moustache makes his expressions readable from a distance and gives him a slightly mature, captain-like presence without being scary. The goggles do double duty: they read as sporty safety gear (you could imagine him zooming through the air and protecting his eyes), and they also add a futuristic, pilotish flair that separates him from plain gym-teacher types. Together they create an instantly recognizable silhouette that kids can imitate with costumes and toys. Beyond aesthetics, those elements worked brilliantly for merchandising and character continuity. I used to wear plastic goggles and draw tiny moustaches on superhero sketches, which shows how much the look encouraged play and identity — a perfect mix of practical protection and theatrical style that still makes me grin.

Baru-baru ini aku lagi kepo soal itu juga, dan intinya: sampai sekarang nggak ada versi resmi berbahasa Indonesia dari lagu 'Lovers Rock' oleh TV Girl. Aku sudah cek di platform streaming besar dan rilisan resmi band, dan yang ada hanyalah versi aslinya dalam bahasa Inggris. Jadi kalau yang kamu cari adalah rilisan resmi atau terjemahan yang didistribusikan oleh pihak band atau label, sepertinya belum ada. Di sisi lain, ada banyak terjemahan non-resmi yang dibuat penggemar. Aku sering menemukan terjemahan baris demi baris di forum lirik, video YouTube dengan subtitle terjemahan, atau unggahan di blog musik. Biasanya kualitasnya beragam: ada yang literal sampai kaku, ada juga yang lebih bebas supaya tetap enak dinyanyikan dalam bahasa Indonesia. Kalau kamu mau, carilah kata kunci seperti "Lovers Rock lirik terjemahan" atau "Lovers Rock terjemahan Indonesia" di mesin pencari, YouTube, atau situs lirik seperti Genius—di situ sering ada catatan pengguna. Kalau tujuanmu adalah menyanyikan versi Indonesia sendiri, aku pribadi suka menerjemahkan sambil mempertahankan nuansa dan rima, bukan sekadar kata-per-kata. Perlu diingat soal hak cipta kalau mau mempublikasikan terjemahan lengkapnya; seringkali aman kalau hanya membahas atau menerjemahkan cuplikan pendek untuk keperluan pribadi. Buatku, lagu ini tetap punya vibe dreamy yang enak diterjemahkan, dan kadang terjemahan penggemar justru memberi perspektif baru yang seru.

Aku sempat ngulik sendiri soal siapa yang menulis lirik 'Lovers Rock', karena lagunya selalu stuck di kepala aku. Dari beberapa sumber publik yang saya cek, kredit penulisan lirik umumnya diberikan kepada Brad Petering — dia yang sering muncul sebagai penulis utama pada banyak rilisan band ini. Halaman lirik di Genius untuk 'Lovers Rock' mencantumkan nama tersebut, dan halaman artis serta rilisan di Bandcamp resmi TV Girl juga konsisten menempatkan Brad sebagai kreator lagu-lagu mereka. Kalau kamu mau bukti yang bisa diperiksa sendiri, carilah entri lagu di situs seperti Genius (halaman lirik dan kredit), Bandcamp resmi TV Girl (halaman rilisan/tracklist), serta database katalog musik seperti Discogs yang sering memuat kredit penulisan dan produksi. Kadang detail produksi juga menyertakan Jason Wyman sebagai kolaborator produksi, jadi kalau melihat kredit lengkap, kamu mungkin menemukan nama lain di bagian produksi atau aransemen. Buat aku, mengetahui nama di balik lirik bikin lagu itu terasa lebih personal — terutama karena gaya penulisan Brad sering bernada sinis dan manis sekaligus, dan itu sangat terasa di 'Lovers Rock'.

I got a huge grin the first time I joined a fossil-filled cave with a buddy on console while I was on PC — crossplay in 'Deep Rock Galactic' really changes the social vibe. To the core of your question: yes, crossplay is enabled by default on Steam. That means when you queue for public missions you'll often mix with players on Xbox or other platforms that support cross-platform matchmaking, unless you change your settings. If you prefer pure PC matches, you can turn that off. There's a matchmaking or multiplayer option in the game's settings where you can disable cross-platform matchmaking, or simply host a private lobby and invite only Steam friends. One extra practical thing I’ve learned is that inviting friends across platforms sometimes routes through whichever friend service they use, so linking accounts or using platform invites helps keep the party together. Also, if you love tinkering with mods, remember that playing with console friends usually blocks Workshop mods — they won’t be able to join if your lobby uses custom content. I like having crossplay on most of the time because I’ve made ridiculous memories joining an Xbox squad for a hungover Thursday run, but when I want silky-smooth PC-only performance I flip it off and queue solo or with Steam friends. It’s handy to have the choice, and honestly the default-on feel keeps lobbies lively — I still smile thinking about that time we evacuated with three seconds on the clock.

Whenever I load up 'Deep Rock Galactic' with friends across different platforms, I still get a kick out of how seamless it can feel — and how a few little settings or account quirks can trip you up. In my experience, crossplay for 'Deep Rock Galactic' is broadly supported: the developers added functionality so PC and console players can squad up without having to all own the same storefront version. That means Steam players, Microsoft Store/Windows users, Xbox folks, and PlayStation players (after later updates) can usually play together, assuming everyone has their online subscriptions and platform accounts in order. There are caveats, though. It isn’t so much that crossplay is limited by country borders as it is limited by platform ecosystems, account region settings, and local store policies. For example, if someone’s console account is tied to a different region storefront, or a platform requires region-specific licensing, that can block invites or purchases. Some countries also have special regulations or separate storefronts which can affect matchmaking or availability. Latency and matchmaking preferences will usually place you with nearby servers first, so playing with someone on the other side of the planet might work but could feel laggy. Practical tip from my nights playing: make sure everyone links whatever platform account the game requests in the game's social menu, enable any crossplay toggle if present, and be mindful of NAT types. If you run into problems, double-check each player’s account region and whether a console’s online subscription is active. Personally I love how easy it is to grief-free coal-mining mayhem with pals from different setups — it’s one of the best multiplayer conveniences in recent years.

Nothing flips the emotional thermostat of a scene faster than a deliberately weird soundtrack, and I love when composers lean into discomfort to make on-screen friction bite. I find dissonant string clusters and sparse piano—the kind that sits just off-key—are classics for arguing couples, moral dilemmas, and power plays. Think of a slow, grinding violin ostinato that refuses to resolve; it makes every look and pause feel like a razor. Electronic drones and low-frequency pulses do similar work when the conflict is more systemic or psychological: they create a pressure you can almost feel in your chest. Modern shows that mix these tools—like the glitchy industrial textures in 'Watchmen' and the clipped, formal piano motifs in 'Succession'—use sound to make polite dinners feel like minefields. I also adore when shows use contemporary songs against the grain. Plopping an upbeat or nostalgic track over a blackout of moral certainty creates cognitive dissonance that heightens friction. Diegetic music—radio songs playing in the room—can be even nastier: characters forced to hear the same song while trying not to explode adds a deliciously cruel layer. For fights, silence punctuated by a single, metallic note or an otherwise mundane cue (a clock, a fridge hum amplified) often lands harder than a full orchestra. Personally, I gravitate toward scores that are willing to be uncomfortable; those moments stick with me long after the credits roll.

On screen, the marriage plot gets remodeled more times than a house in a long-running drama — and that’s part of the thrill for me. I love watching how interior conflicts that sit on a page become gestures, silences, and costume choices. A novel can spend pages inside a character’s head doubting a union; a film often has to externalize that with a single look across a dinner table, a carefully timed close-up, or a song cue. That compression forces filmmakers to pick themes and symbols — maybe focusing on money, or on infidelity, or on social status — and those choices change what the marriage represents. In 'Pride and Prejudice' adaptations, for instance, the difference between the 1995 miniseries and the 2005 film shows how runtime and medium shape the plot: the miniseries can luxuriate in slow courtship and social nuance, while the film leans into visual chemistry and decisive, cinematic moments that simplify the gradual shift of feeling into a handful of scenes. Studio pressures and star personas twist things too. I’ve noticed adaptations will soften or harden endings depending on what the market demands: a studio might want closure and hope in one era, and ambiguity or moral punishment in another. Casting famous faces gives marriage plots a different gravitational pull — two charismatic leads can sell redemption, while a more restrained actor might foreground the tragedy or compromise in the union. Censorship and cultural context also matter: the same text transplanted across countries or decades will recast marriage as liberation in one version and entrapment in another. Take 'Anna Karenina' adaptations — some highlight the societal traps pressing on the heroine, others stage her story like a psychological breakdown or a stylized performance piece, and each decision reframes the marital stakes. When directors shift focalization away from one spouse and onto peripheral characters, the marriage plot ceases to be private drama and becomes commentary on community, class, or gender norms. I also love how serialized TV and streaming have complicated the marriage plot in fresh ways. Extended runs allow subplots, slow erosions of intimacy, affairs that unwind across seasons, and secondary characters who become mirrors or foils; shows can turn a single-book plot into decades of relational history. Music, production design, and editing rhythms do heavy lifting too — a montage can compress a marriage’s deterioration into a three-minute sequence that hits harder than a paragraph of prose. And modern adaptors often update power dynamics: formerly passive wives get agency, queer re-readings reframe heteronormative endings, and some works even invert the plot to critique the institution itself. All these changes sometimes frustrate purists, but they keep the marriage plot alive and relevant, which is why I can watch both an austere period piece and a glossy modern retelling and still feel moved in different ways — I love that conversation between page and screen.