How Accurate Is O Reilly's Book To The Original Movie Plot?

I’ve read 'O’Reilly’s' book and watched the original movie multiple times, and I’d say the book does a solid job of staying true to the movie’s plot, but it’s not a carbon copy. The book expands on certain scenes and adds layers to the characters that the movie couldn’t fully explore due to time constraints. For example, there’s a subplot in the book about the protagonist’s childhood that gives more context to their motivations, which I found really enriching. It’s not in the movie, but it doesn’t feel out of place—it feels like a natural extension of the story.

That said, there are moments where the book takes liberties. Some of the dialogue is rephrased, and a few scenes are rearranged for pacing. I noticed that the book tends to linger on emotional beats longer, which I appreciated because it gave me a deeper connection to the characters. The movie, on the other hand, is more visual and relies on its cinematography to convey those same emotions. It’s not that one is better than the other—they just have different strengths.

What really stood out to me was how the book handles the climax. In the movie, it’s this high-octane, edge-of-your-seat sequence that’s over in a flash. The book slows it down, adding internal monologues and background details that make the stakes feel even higher. I found myself holding my breath even though I already knew how it would end. It’s a testament to how well the book captures the essence of the movie while still making it feel fresh.

Overall, I’d say the book is about 85% accurate to the movie plot. It’s faithful enough that fans of the movie won’t feel lost, but it also offers enough new material to make it worth reading. If you’re someone who loves diving deeper into the world of a story, this book is a great companion to the movie. It doesn’t just retell the story—it enhances it.